United States v. Guardado-Ortega

115 F. App'x 288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Guardado-Ortega. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 F. App'x 302
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2004·No. 04-20299·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Guardado-Ortega (“Guardado”) appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea convictions for use of a non-immigrant visa obtained by fraud and for illegal reentry following deportation subsequent to a conviction for an aggravated felony. Guardado argues that the district court erred by finding that his California felony convictions for possession of cocaine and possession of a controlled substance were aggravated felonies for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) and 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B), because his offenses were punishable only as misdemeanors under federal law.

Guardado’s argument is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691, 694 (5th Cir.1997). Accordingly, Guardado’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Guardado-Ortega, 115 F. App'x 288 (5th Cir. 2004).

115 F. App'x 288 (United States v. Guardado-Ortega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez
130 F.3d 691 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)