United States v. Guardado
76 M.J. 166, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 273
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedMarch 3, 2017
DocketNo. 17-0183/AR
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 76 M.J. 166 (United States v. Guardado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Guardado, 76 M.J. 166, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 273 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 20140014. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER THE ARMY COURT INCORRECTLY FOUND THAT THE MILITARY JUDGE’S PANEL INSTRUCTIONS WERE HARMLESS ERROR IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v. HILLS.
II. WHETHER THE ARMY COURT INCORRECTLY RULED THAT AN OFFENSE DEFINED BY THE PRESIDENT CANNOT PREEMPT A GENERAL ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, OFFENSE, AND THAT PREEMPTION IS NOT JURISDICTIONAL IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue I only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Bailey
Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2017
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 166, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-guardado-armfor-2017.