United States v. Guadalupe Presas, Jr.
Opinion
In the recent case of Sifuentes v. United States, affirmed sub nom., United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976), the Supreme Court held that stops, as in the case at bar, for brief questioning routinely conducted at such permanent checkpoints as Sarita, Texas are consistent with the Fourth Amendment.
In this case as appellant’s automobile approached the point where the Border Patrolman was standing, the officer shined his flashlight on the front license plate and saw a marijuana brick hidden behind the grill of the car.
The sighting of the marijuana in the plain view of the officer clearly justified the seizure of the contraband and appellant’s conviction is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
543 F.2d 552 (United States v. Guadalupe Presas, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.