United States v. Guadalupe Presas, Jr.
This text of 543 F.2d 552 (United States v. Guadalupe Presas, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the recent case of Sifuentes v. United States, affirmed sub nom., United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976), the Supreme Court held that stops, as in the case at bar, for brief questioning routinely conducted at such permanent checkpoints as Sarita, Texas are consistent with the Fourth Amendment.
In this case as appellant’s automobile approached the point where the Border Patrolman was standing, the officer shined his flashlight on the front license plate and saw a marijuana brick hidden behind the grill of the car.
The sighting of the marijuana in the plain view of the officer clearly justified the seizure of the contraband and appellant’s conviction is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
543 F.2d 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-guadalupe-presas-jr-ca5-1976.