United States v. Groseclose

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Groseclose

101 F.2d 1021, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4543

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 1939

DocketNo. 7775

StatusPublished

This text of 101 F.2d 1021 (United States v. Groseclose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Groseclose, 101 F.2d 1021, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4543 (6th Cir. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss the appeal filed October 8, 1937, is denied. The motion of appellant for permission now to file the record is granted; and the cause having been heard upon the record, briefs and [1022]*1022argument of counsel, and the court being of opinion that there was substantial evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss the appeal filed October 8, 1937, is denied. The motion of appellant for permission now to file the record is granted; and the cause having been heard upon the record, briefs and [1022]*1022argument of counsel, and the court being of opinion that there was substantial evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 F.2d 1021, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-groseclose-ca6-1939.