United States v. Groob

Second Circuit

United States v. Groob

325 F.2d 436

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 7, 1964·No. No. 191, Docket 28456·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the District Court on the authority of In re Myers, 1928, 2 Cir., 24 F.2d 349. The principles controlling this case were there formulated by Judge Learned Hand and have been followed in this Circuit for thirty-five years. This case does not present an occasion for reappraisal of those principles. See generally 4 Collier, Bankruptcy § 70.99 at 1904-1910, 1917-1918 (14th ed. 1962); Annot., 48 A.L.R.2d 1343 (1956).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the District Court on the authority of In re Myers, 1928, 2 Cir., 24 F.2d 349. The principles controlling this case were there formulated by Judge Learned Hand and have been followed in this Circuit for thirty-five years. This case does not present an occasion for reappraisal of those principles. See generally 4 Collier, Bankruptcy § 70.99 at 1904-1910, 1917-1918 (14th ed. 1962); Annot., 48 A.L.R.2d 1343 (1956).

Affirmed.

United States v. Groob, 325 F.2d 436 (2d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

325 F.2d 436 (United States v. Groob) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related