United States v. Grimes

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Grimes. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 F.3d 375
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 21, 1999·No. 98-51035·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-51035 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TAVICHE MARQUISE GRIMES, also known as Taviche M. Grimes,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-97-CR-63-1-S --------------------

October 20, 1999

Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Taviche Marquise Grimes

has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Grimes and

a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Grimes has responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review

of the brief, the record, and Grimes’s response discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, Grimes’s court-appointed

attorney’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; the attorney is excused

from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. -2-

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Grimes, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Grimes (United States v. Grimes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)