United States v. Grigg

24 F.2d 638, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2123
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 5, 1928
DocketNos. 5261, 5264, 5263, 5262
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 F.2d 638 (United States v. Grigg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Grigg, 24 F.2d 638, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2123 (9th Cir. 1928).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The policy involved in this case lapsed for failure to pay premiums after February 1, 1919, unless the defendant in error was permanently and totally disabled prior to that date. No claim under the policy was made to the Director of the Veterans’ Bureau until July 16, 1926, or until more than six years thereafter. The cause of action was therefore barred, and the judgment of the court below is reversed, on the authority of United States v. Sligh (No. 5260) 24 F.(2d) 636, just decided.

By stipulation of counsel, similar orders will be made in United States v. Wooten, No. 5264, United States v. Ledbetter, No. 5263, and United States v. Kent, No. 5262.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baille v. United States
70 F.2d 527 (Eighth Circuit, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F.2d 638, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-grigg-ca9-1928.