United States v. Gregory L. Wallace

142 F.3d 447, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 15650, 1998 WL 228231
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1998
Docket97-30333
StatusUnpublished

This text of 142 F.3d 447 (United States v. Gregory L. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gregory L. Wallace, 142 F.3d 447, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 15650, 1998 WL 228231 (9th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

142 F.3d 447

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gregory L. WALLACE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-30333.
D.C. No. CR-96-00079-1.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

.
Submitted April 20, 19982.
Decided April 28, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Jack D. Shanstrom, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM1

Gregory L. Wallace appeals the sentence imposed following his jury conviction for aggravated assault. We dismiss.

Wallace contends that his 46-month sentence was "disproportionately high" because he would have received a lesser sentence had he killed the victim and been convicted of involuntary manslaughter. We construe Wallace's argument as an attempt to appeal the district court's denial of his request for a downward departure.

At the sentencing hearing, Wallace sought a downward departure on the ground that he would have received a lesser sentence had he been charged with and convicted of involuntary manslaughter. The district court denied his request. Because nothing in the record suggests that the district court was under the impression that it could not depart downward if it chose to do so, we lack jurisdiction to review the district court's decision. See United States v. Heim, 15 F.3d 830, 833 (9th Cir.1994).

DISMISSED.

2

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 F.3d 447, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 15650, 1998 WL 228231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gregory-l-wallace-ca9-1998.