United States v. Gregory Kirk Bell

881 F.2d 1070, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10716, 1989 WL 87668
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 25, 1989
Docket89-7031
StatusUnpublished

This text of 881 F.2d 1070 (United States v. Gregory Kirk Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gregory Kirk Bell, 881 F.2d 1070, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10716, 1989 WL 87668 (4th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

881 F.2d 1070
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gregory Kirk BELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-7031.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 1989.
Decided July 25, 1989.

Gregory Kirk Bell, Appellant pro se.

Karen Breeding Peters, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

After consideration of the materials filed by appellant Gregory Kirk Bell with his petition for rehearing, we find that his motion for reconsideration of the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion was timely filed. The district court, therefore, had jurisdiction to reconsider its prior order. Accordingly, we grant rehearing and withdraw our previous opinion and judgment.

Upon consideration of the merits of Bell's appeal, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Bell's motion for reduction of his sentence both initially and on reconsideration. We affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Vincent (Alfred J.)
881 F.2d 1070 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
881 F.2d 1070, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10716, 1989 WL 87668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gregory-kirk-bell-ca4-1989.