United States v. Gregory Holt
This text of 114 F. App'x 762 (United States v. Gregory Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gregory Houston Holt appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon the revocation of his supervised release. We affirm.
Holt pled guilty to possession of a firearm with no serial number, a class D felony, and was sentenced to three years of probation. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(k). After violating his probation, Holt was sentenced to six months in prison and 24 months of supervised release. He violated the conditions of his supervised release in August 2003, whereupon the district court revoked his release and imposed a sentence of 18 months imprisonment followed by 18 months of additional supervised release. Holt contends, citing United States v. St. John, 92 F.3d 761, 766-67 (8th Cir.1996), that because he was given 24 months of supervised release after his probation violation, the additional imprisonment and supervised release ordered upon revocation must be capped at 24 months.
We rejected an identical argument in U.S. v. Palmer, No. 03-1333, 2004 WL 1878356 (8th Cir. Aug 24, 2004) (en banc), and overruled St. John’s interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and (h). We concluded that a defendant may be sentenced *763 to a term of imprisonment and a further term of supervised release which, in the aggregate, do not exceed the term of supervised release authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in the original term of supervised release. Palmer, 380 F.3d 393, 2004 WL 1878356, at *3. Here, because the underlying offense is a class D felony, a term of supervised release of up to three years is authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(2). Accordingly, the district court did not err in sentencing Holt to terms of imprisonment and supervised release totaling 36 months.
The judgment is affirmed.
. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 F. App'x 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gregory-holt-ca8-2004.