United States v. Gregory Flores

563 F. App'x 566

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gregory Anthony Flores appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 144-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for wire fraud conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349; and tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Flores contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of his age and poor health, and because U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 lacks proper empirical foundation. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Flores’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Flores’s offense conduct. See id. Moreover, the district court was under no obligation to vary from the Guidelines based on policy considerations. See United States v. Carper, 659 F.3d 923, 925 (9th Cir.2011).

AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.