United States v. Gregory

137 F. App'x 605
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2005·No. No. 05-6502·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Gregory appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Rule 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gregory, No. CR-92-163-N (E.D.Va. Mar. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gregory, 137 F. App'x 605 (4th Cir. 2005).

137 F. App'x 605 (United States v. Gregory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.