United States v. Gregory Brown

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gregory Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 765 F.3d 185
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 4, 2014·No. 13-4442·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 13-4442

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

GREGORY GARRETT BROWN,

Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal Action No. 1-11-cr-00034-001) District Judge: Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.

Argued June 12, 2014

Before: AMBRO and BARRY, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,* Judge

(Opinion filed September 2, 2014)

ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed September 2, 2014, be amended as follows:

On page 11, in the second full paragraph, fifth line down, insert the word “court”

after “sentencing” and before “should” so that the phrase reads: “a sentencing court should first determine a violation . . . .”

By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: November 4, 2014 Tmm/cc: all counsel of record

*

Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gregory Brown, (3d Cir. 2014).

United States v. Gregory Brown (United States v. Gregory Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.