United States v. Gregory Archie Green
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
No. 22-11895
Non-Argument Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus GREGORY ARCHIE GREEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cr-00101-LSC-GMB-9
2 Opinion of the Court 22-11895
Before JORDAN, BRANCH, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Gregory Green appeals the substantive reasonableness of his 18-month sentence following his supervised release revocation. But he has now served all of that sentence, so a ruling in his favor wouldn’t provide him any relief. As the parties acknowledge, Green’s appeal is moot for that reason. See United States v. Farmer, 923 F.2d 1557, 1568 (11th Cir. 1991) (holding that where an “[a]ppellant has completed his sentence,” an “appeal on [a sentencing ] issue” is moot). We thus dismiss his appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Gregory Archie Green (United States v. Gregory Archie Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.