United States v. Gregorio Victor Villahermosa

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Gregorio Victor Villahermosa

411 F.2d 599, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12231

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 27, 1969

Docket23652

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 411 F.2d 599 (United States v. Gregorio Victor Villahermosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Gregorio Victor Villahermosa, 411 F.2d 599, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12231 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Defendant’s sole point on appeal from his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 173 is that the trial court improperly permitted the use of evidence of defendant’s prior convictions for impeachment. Defendant relies upon the line of cases following Luck v. United States, 121 U.S.App. D.C. 151, 348 F.2d 763 (1965). Since no objection was made to the evidence, its use was not reversible error. Hood v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 16, 365 F. 2d 949, 951 (1966).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Defendant’s sole point on appeal from his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 173 is that the trial court improperly permitted the use of evidence of defendant’s prior convictions for impeachment. Defendant relies upon the line of cases following Luck v. United States, 121 U.S.App. D.C. 151, 348 F.2d 763 (1965). Since no objection was made to the evidence, its use was not reversible error. Hood v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 16, 365 F. 2d 949, 951 (1966).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

411 F.2d 599, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gregorio-victor-villahermosa-ca9-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack