United States v. Gregorio Garcia, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 4, 2020
Docket19-50438
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Gregorio Garcia, Jr. (United States v. Gregorio Garcia, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gregorio Garcia, Jr., (5th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

Case: 19-50438 Document: 00515331477 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED March 4, 2020 No. 19-50438 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GREGORIO GARCIA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:18-CR-485-1

Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gregorio Garcia, Jr. appeals his bench-trial conviction for conspiracy to transport illegal aliens. On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient for conviction because there was no evidence of an agreement between himself and any other individual to transport the illegal aliens. In reviewing a bench-trial conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and defer to reasonable inferences drawn

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 19-50438 Document: 00515331477 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2020

No. 19-50438

by the district court. United States v. Esparza, 678 F.3d 389, 392 (5th Cir. 2012). The focus of our review is on “whether the finding of guilt is supported by substantial evidence, i.e., evidence sufficient to justify the trial judge, as the trier of fact, in concluding beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.” Id. (internal quotations marks and citation omitted). Here, there was sufficient evidence in the record to establish that Garcia came to an agreement with one or more people regarding the transportation of illegal aliens. See id. Garcia drove in tandem with the black Camaro driven by Monica Benavidez on February 20, 2018; both vehicles were registered to “A. Benavidez”; Garcia stated that the white F-150 pickup truck was given to him by Benavidez; and the cell phone found in the F-150 appeared to belong to Benavidez. Garcia performed several U-turns on Farm-to-Market Road 117 while driving, as though he were looking for something or someone, and two of the illegal aliens were told by relatives or people involved in the smuggling operation that they would be picked up on February 20 on FM 117 by an older white truck. AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Esparza
678 F.3d 389 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Gregorio Garcia, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gregorio-garcia-jr-ca5-2020.