United States v. Gregg

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Gregg

231 F. App'x 936

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 16, 2007·No. No. 06-16052·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PEE CURIAM:

Laurence H. Margolis, appointed counsel for Christopher Anthony Gregg, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Gregg’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM:

Laurence H. Margolis, appointed counsel for Christopher Anthony Gregg, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Gregg’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gregg, 231 F. App'x 936 (11th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

231 F. App'x 936 (United States v. Gregg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related