United States v. Greene
This text of United States v. Greene (United States v. Greene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Austin S. GREENE Machinist Mate Fireman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy Appellant _________________________
No. 201800285 _________________________
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Decided: 25 January 2019 _________________________
Military Judge: Commander Stephen Reyes, JAGC, USN Approved Sentence: Confinement for six months, and a bad-conduct discharge. Sentence adjudged 8 June 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Fleet Activity Yokosuka, Japan, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. For Appellant: Commander R. D. Evans, Jr., JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a). _________________________
Before HUTCHISON, TANG, and LAWRENCE Appellate Military Judges United States v. Greene, No. 201800285
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor- rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). However, we note that the court-martial order (CMO) does not accurately reflect that Specification 1 of Charge I alleged an attempted sexu- al assault of a child vice an attempted sexual abuse of a child. Although we find no prejudice from this scrivener’s error regarding a specification that was withdrawn and dismissed, the appellant is entitled to have court-martial records that correctly reflect the results of his proceeding. United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998). Accordingly, the con- vening authority shall issue a supplemental CMO correctly reflecting the of- fense alleged in Specification 1 of Charge I. The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Greene, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-greene-nmcca-2019.