United States v. Green

26 F. Cas. 30, 2 D.C. 520, 2 Cranch 520
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided December 15, 1824·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

decided that this was not a warrant or order for the payment of money, and therefore not within the statute of Maryland ; but that the indictment was good as an indictment for forgery at common law, upon the following authorities; The King v. Ward, 2 Ld. Raym. 1461, and the cases there cited, namely, Rex v. Stocker, 5 Mod. 137; S. C. 1 Salk. 342, 371, which was an indictment at common law for forging a bill of lading, and which was adjudged bad on demurrer because the charge was in the alternative, namely, that he forged or caused to be forged; but no exception- was taken to it because the offence was not forgery at common law. Rex v. Ferrers, 1 Sid. 278. Forging an acquittance for £7. Farr's case, T. Raym. 81. A warrant of attorney. Dudley's case, 2 Sid. 71. The entry of a marriage in the register of marriages. Savage's case, Styles, 12. Letters of credence for collecting money. Rex v. Deakins, 1 Sid. 142, for counterfeiting a protection in the name of Sir Anthony Ashley Cooper, as a member of Parliament, when he was not. Regina v. Yarrington, 1 Salk. 406. For forging a letter. Rex v. Ward, 2 Ld. Raym. 1466. For forging an in-dorsement on the back of a certificate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Green, 26 F. Cas. 30, 2 D.C. 520, 2 Cranch 520 (circtddc 1824).

26 F. Cas. 30 (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruce Henry v. Sheriff of Tuscaloosa County, Alabama
135 F.4th 1271 (Eleventh Circuit, 2025)
In re Taylor
19 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 438 (Wood County Court of Common Pleas, 1913)