United States v. Green
This text of 26 F. Cas. 30 (United States v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
decided that this was not a warrant or order for the payment of money, and therefore not within the statute of Maryland ; but that the indictment was good as an indictment for forgery at common law, upon the following authorities; The King v. Ward, 2 Ld. Raym. 1461, and the cases there cited, namely, Rex v. Stocker, 5 Mod. 137; S. C. 1 Salk. 342, 371, which was an indictment at common law for forging a bill of lading, and which was adjudged bad on demurrer because the charge was in the alternative, namely, that he forged or caused to be forged; but no exception- was taken to it because the offence was not forgery at common law. Rex v. Ferrers, 1 Sid. 278. Forging an acquittance for £7. Farr's case, T. Raym. 81. A warrant of attorney. Dudley's case, 2 Sid. 71. The entry of a marriage in the register of marriages. Savage's case, Styles, 12. Letters of credence for collecting money. Rex v. Deakins, 1 Sid. 142, for counterfeiting a protection in the name of Sir Anthony Ashley Cooper, as a member of Parliament, when he was not. Regina v. Yarrington, 1 Salk. 406. For forging a letter. Rex v. Ward, 2 Ld. Raym. 1466. For forging an in-dorsement on the back of a certificate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F. Cas. 30, 2 D.C. 520, 2 Cranch 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-green-circtddc-1824.