United States v. Green

310 F. App'x 620
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 F. App'x 550
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2009·No. No. 08-7106·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodriguez Shawn Green appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Green, No. 4:05-cr-00904-RBH-2 (D.S.C. June 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Green, 310 F. App'x 620 (4th Cir. 2009).

310 F. App'x 620 (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.