United States v. Green

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 F. App'x 550
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2009·No. 08-7106·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7106

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RODRIGUEZ SHAWN GREEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00904-RBH-2)

Submitted: February 2, 2009 Decided: February 10, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodriguez Shawn Green, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rodriguez Shawn Green appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for sentence modification. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Green, No. 4:05-cr-00904-RBH-2 (D.S.C. June 16, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Green, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Green (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.