United States v. Green

119 F. App'x 502
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 12, 2005
Docket04-7300
StatusUnpublished

This text of 119 F. App'x 502 (United States v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Green, 119 F. App'x 502 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

*503 PER CURIAM:

Terry Lee Green seeks to appeal the dismissal of his motion characterized by the district court as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The district court’s order was entered on February 19, 2004. However, Green did not file his notice of appeal until, at the earliest, July 28, 2004, * which is outside the sixty-day appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), and beyond the thirty-day period allowed under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5). See Shah v. Hutto, 722 F.2d 1167, 1168 (4th Cir.1983) (holding that a motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal must be filed no later than thirty days after the expiration of the original appeal period in order for a court of appeals to have jurisdiction over the appeal).

Green’s notice of appeal, which alleges that he did not timely receive notice of the dismissal of his action, may be properly construed as a motion to reopen the time to note an appeal under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). United States v. Feuver, 236 F.3d 725, 729 & n. 7 (D.C.Cir.2001). Accordingly, we remand the case to the district court in order for that court to determine whether Green can satisfy the requirements of Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). Ogden v. San Juan County, 32 F.3d 452, 454 (10th Cir.1994). We express no opinion as to whether Green has met the requirements of Rule 4(a)(6). The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED

*

At the earliest, Green filed his notice of appeal on July 28, 2004, the date he states in his certificate of service that he placed it in the prison mail system. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Feuver, Scott Lee
236 F.3d 725 (D.C. Circuit, 2001)
Shah v. Hutto
722 F.2d 1167 (Fourth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 F. App'x 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-green-ca4-2005.