United States v. Green

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Green

219 F. App'x 969

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 13, 2007·No. No. 06-12946·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark Graham Hanson, counsel for Quantrelle Donte Green, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of [970] merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Green’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mark Graham Hanson, counsel for Quantrelle Donte Green, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of [970] merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Green’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Green, 219 F. App'x 969 (11th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

219 F. App'x 969 (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related