United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

103 F. Supp. 889, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4593
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin
DecidedMarch 5, 1952
DocketCiv. No. 2016
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 103 F. Supp. 889 (United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 103 F. Supp. 889, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4593 (W.D. Wis. 1952).

Opinion

STONE, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

I.

The defendant, Great Northern Railway Company, a Minnesota corporation, owns and operates a system of railway as a common carrier in interstate and intrastate commerce in the states of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana, Idaho, Washington, Oregon, California and the province of British Columbia. At Superior, Wisconsin, it maintains and operates one if its important terminals. Its facilities at this terminal consist of yards, shops, roundhouses, grain elevators, ore docks, a warehouse and an office building for the Mesabi Division. One of its yards in the City of Superior is called by it the “Superior Yard”. It has another yard in the City of Superior called the “Allouez Yard” and a yard just beyond the city limits of Superior called the “Saunders Yard”, which are respectively 9 and 4 miles from the Superior Yard.

II.

Exhibit 1 is a map drawn to the scale of 1"=10O' showing the Superior Yard and the shop and roundhouse area of the Great Northern Railway Company in the City of Superior. The various yards described in Paragraph III hereof are shown as marked on Exhibit 1. The track switches along the route of the movement in question are shown circled in green and num[890]*890bered 1 through 16 consecutively from track No. 15 in the Elevator Yard to track No. 8 in the Outbound Yard. The movement of the cars, which is the subject of this action and which is described in Paragraph XVI hereof, is shown in the solid red line running along the tracks used. The movements of the crew in assembling the 12 cars in the Elevator Yard and in classifying the 12 cars in the Outbound Yard are indicated by the dashed red line.

Exhibit 2 is a map, identified on its face as “Map of the City of Superior, Douglas County, Wis., 1929, E. B. Banks — City Engineer, Raymond Mapp — Delineator” and is a substantially correct representation of the relationship of the area involved in this action to the remainder of the City of Superior.

Exhibit 3 is a photograph taken at a point 250 feet north" of the L. S. T. & T. railroad crossing looking southwesterly and southeasterly showing the view available on the .approach to the railroad crossing from the north. To the left of the crossing is shown the shelter 'house for the flagman on duty at the crossing.

Exhibit 4 is a photograph taken from the cab window of Engine No. 1173 on the engineer’s or right hand side at a point 220 feet north of the Winter Street grade crossing showing the view of Winter Street available in a westerly direction.

Exhibit 5 is a photograph taken from the cab window of Engine No. 1173 on the fireman’s or left 'hand side at a point 220 feet north of the Winter Street grade crossing showing the view of Winter Street to the east.

III.

The Superior Yard, as shown on Exhibit 1, consists of several component and contiguous parts, designated for operating convenience by names such as the Twenty Yard, Forty Yard, Sixty Yard, Outbound Yard, Flour Yard and the Elevator Yard. The Twenty Yard is located in the southerly portion of the Superior Yard and is used for breaking up incoming trains and classifying incoming freight cars. The Outbound Yard, which consists of 17 tracks, is adjacent to the Twenty Yard and is used for classifying and assembling outgoing cars and in making up outgoing trains. The Forty Yard is used for the classification of “high class” empty freight cars such as refrigerator cars and box cars used in shipping flour, paper, etc. The Sixty Yard is used for the classification of “rough” empty freight cars such as gondolas, hopper cars and flat cars. The Flour Yard and the Elevator Yard are located at the northerly end of the Superior Yard and are used principally for the temporary storage of both loaded and empty box cars which are to be loaded or unloaded at Elevators “X” and “S”. These elevators are owned and maintained by the Great Northern Railway Company as a part of its railroad system.

The Outbound Yard is located between the Flour and Elevator Yards on the north ■and the Twenty Yard on the south. The Outbound Yard is connected to the Flour and Elevator Yards by two lead tracks, designated as the Flour Yard Lead and the Northwest Lead. These lead tracks north of Winter Street are constructed on a grade ascending from the north to the south of .7%. Across and south of Winter Street the grade is .4%.

IV.

A single track of the Lake Superior Terminal and Transfer Railway Company crosses the Flour Yard Lead and the Northwest Lead at right angles at a point 250 feet north of the Winter Street grade crossing. This railroad crossing is protected by a flagman and a manually operated semaphore. In addition, signs bearing the words "Stop R.R.X.” are located approximately 260 feet from said railroad crossing on the four approaches to the crossing. All movements on the L.S.T. & T. tracks come to a stop before proceeding over this crossing, whereas movements on the Great Northern tracks do not have to stop unless the semaphore signal indicates stop. All movements proceed over said crossing as directed by and in compliance with signals given by the previously mentioned flagman and semaphore. The records of the defendant railway company show that this crossing has been free of all accidents since the crossing was established more than 60 years ago.

[891]*891v.

The track of the Lake Superior Terminal and Transfer Railway, as it runs west of the defendant’s two leads crosses a railroad bridge leading to Duluth as- shown on Exhibit 2. The following is the approximate number of trains using the Lake Superior Terminal and Transfer Railway track and crossing the defendant’s two lead tracks during each 24 hour period:

Soo Line — 3 passenger trains each way.

Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway —1 passenger train each way.

Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific — average 2 freight trains per day each way.

Northern Pacific Railway — 1 passenger train and 2 freight trains each way.

Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Railway — 3 freights each way.

There is some variation in the total number of trains but t'he average daily total number is 12 each way.

VI.

Winter Street extends in an easterly and westerly direction. The grade crossing in question at Winter Street is protected by two standard cross buck railroad warning signs conforming to the requirements of Section 192.29(5), Wis.Stats. These signs are located on both sides of the crossing and are visible on Winter Street for more than 100 feet on each side of the crossing. Winter Street is a brick paved city street and one-half mile east of the area involved herein runs through a main portion of the City of Superior. It is one of four streets giving access from the main portion of the city to the establishments which are referred to in Paragraph VII hereof as being located west of the area involved herein. The other three streets are Susquehanna Avenue, Maryland Avenue, both being city streets paved with gravel, and a cinder and gravel road maintained by the Great Northern Railway Company and known as “Great Northern Road”. The Great Northern Road is about 75 feet west of its shops and railroad tracks and it is used by the public. There are no railroad tracks crossing these three streets.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company
258 F.2d 262 (Fourth Circuit, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F. Supp. 889, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-great-northern-ry-co-wiwd-1952.