United States v. Grayson
This text of United States v. Grayson (United States v. Grayson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6843
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JOHNNY GRAYSON,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00046-FPS-1)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Grayson, Appellant Pro Se. Randolph John Bernard, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Johnny Grayson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion requesting to serve his term of imprisonment
in home confinement based on his medical condition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Grayson, No. 5:08-cr-00046-FPS-1 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 24,
2009). We further deny Grayson’s motions for transcripts at
government expense, for appointment of counsel, for appointment
of Douglas VanVleet as his jailhouse lawyer, to allow VanVleet
to enter an appearance, and for a ninety-day extension of time
to file his brief. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Grayson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-grayson-ca4-2009.