United States v. Grayce Marie Cativiela

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Grayce Marie Cativiela

460 F.2d 192, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9411

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 23, 1972

Docket71-1817

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 460 F.2d 192 (United States v. Grayce Marie Cativiela) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Grayce Marie Cativiela, 460 F.2d 192, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9411 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment and conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 495 is affirmed.

The alleged newly discovered evidence offered in the petition for a new trial was either available at trial or was unlikely to produce an acquittal. It was not error to deny appellant’s motion for new trial. Evalt v. United States, 382 F.2d 424 (9th Cir. 1967).

None of the court’s rulings on the admissibility of evidence claimed by the appellant as error was an abuse of discretion or resulted in prejudice to the appellant. Therefore appellant’s claims are without merit. United States v. Brown, 455 F.2d 1201 (9th Cir. 1972).

The written stipulation of facts and the jury waiver signed by the appellant are valid waivers and do not deny due process. United States v. Goodwin, 446 F.2d 894 (9th Cir. 1971); Pool v. United States, 344 F.2d 943 (9th Cir. 1965).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI