United States v. Gray

District of Columbia

United States v. Gray

64 F. App'x 251

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedMay 22, 2003

DocketNo. 02-3097

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 F. App'x 251 (United States v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Gray, 64 F. App'x 251 (D.D.C. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellant’s sentence be affirmed. Assuming appellant had a Fifth Amendment privilege that would have prohibited the district court from considering his silence at sentencing in determining whether he had any remorse, appellant failed to articulate a basis for asserting the privilege. See Roberts v. United States, 445 U.S. 552, 559-60, 100 S.Ct. 1358, 63 L.Ed.2d 622 (1980).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellant’s sentence be affirmed. Assuming appellant had a Fifth Amendment privilege that would have prohibited the district court from considering his silence at sentencing in determining whether he had any remorse, appellant failed to articulate a basis for asserting the privilege. See Roberts v. United States, 445 U.S. 552, 559-60, 100 S.Ct. 1358, 63 L.Ed.2d 622 (1980).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gray-dcd-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack