United States v. Gray

26 F. Cas. 17, 2 D.C. 675, 2 Cranch 675
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided May 15, 1826·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Upon the trial,

the Court

(Cranch, C. J., doubting,)

said the general character of the house was in issue, and permitted the attorney of the United States to give evidence of its general reputation.

The Court also (nem. con.) instructed the jury that if they should be satisfied, by the evidence, that the defendants kept a house for the meeting of men and women for illegal and obscene

[676]*676purposes, or for the purpose of enticing young girls there for debauchery, the indictment was supported; and that it was not necessary that the United States should prove all the circumstances laid in the indictment by way of aggravation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gray, 26 F. Cas. 17, 2 D.C. 675, 2 Cranch 675 (circtddc 1826).

26 F. Cas. 17 (United States v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. United States
315 A.2d 569 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1974)
United States v. Laffal
83 A.2d 871 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1951)
Anzine v. United States
260 F. 827 (Ninth Circuit, 1919)
State v. . Price
95 S.E. 478 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)