United States v. Grawey

74 M.J. 329, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 854
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided March 30, 2015·No. No. 14-0060/AF·Published

Opinion

CCA S32029. United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, United States v. Grawey, No. S32029 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. Jul. 22, 2013), we conclude that the appointment of Laurence Soybel as an appellate military judge was unconstitutional and fundamentally deficient, and that therefore the issue of his participation on the panel was not waived by a failure to object. See United States v. Jones, 74 M.J. 95 (C.A.A.F. 2015). Therefore, it is ordered that the judgment of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed, and the record is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a new review under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 (2012), before a properly constituted panel of that court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Grawey, 74 M.J. 329, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 854 (Ark. 2015).

74 M.J. 329 (United States v. Grawey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jones
74 M.J. 95 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2015)