United States v. Gravely
This text of United States v. Gravely (United States v. Gravely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6693
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICHARD GRAVELY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:94-cr-00082-1)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Gravely, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Grimes Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order
adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying Gravely’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Gravely, No. 3:94-cr-00082-1 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 9,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gravely, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gravely-ca4-2009.