United States v. Gravely

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gravely

333 F. App'x 792

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2009·No. No. 09-6693·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Gravely’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gravely, No. 3:94-cr-00082-1, 2009 WL 981836 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Gravely’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gravely, No. 3:94-cr-00082-1, 2009 WL 981836 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gravely, 333 F. App'x 792 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

333 F. App'x 792 (United States v. Gravely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.