United States v. Gravely

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 2009
Docket09-6693
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Gravely (United States v. Gravely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gravely, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6693

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHARD GRAVELY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:94-cr-00082-1)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Gravely, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Grimes Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order

adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying Gravely’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Gravely, No. 3:94-cr-00082-1 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 9,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Gravely, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gravely-ca4-2009.