United States v. Grasseth
This text of 56 F. App'x 840 (United States v. Grasseth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Dominic Alan Grasseth appeals his convictions for mail theft. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
We reject Appellant’s arguments regarding the motion to suppress as that issue has been resolved on another appeal,1 and its resolution is the law of the case.2
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-grasseth-ca9-2003.