United States v. Grant

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

United States v. Grant

26 F. Cas. 10, 7 Chi. Leg. News 116

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio·Decided December 15, 1874·Published

Opinion

Held by

EMMONS. Circuit Judge,

that there was the same answer to this defense, as had been made to the defenses in the other case of U. S. v. Hosmer [Case No. 15,394], but that, inasmuch as the facts in this case, to wit. of an actual seizure or distraint went beyond the reported cases, opportunity should be afforded the defendants to take the opinion of the United States supreme .court. Judgment for plaintiff, with division of opinion to be certified up..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Held by

EMMONS. Circuit Judge,

that there was the same answer to this defense, as had been made to the defenses in the other case of U. S. v. Hosmer [Case No. 15,394], but that, inasmuch as the facts in this case, to wit. of an actual seizure or distraint went beyond the reported cases, opportunity should be afforded the defendants to take the opinion of the United States supreme .court. Judgment for plaintiff, with division of opinion to be certified up..

United States v. Grant, 26 F. Cas. 10, 7 Chi. Leg. News 116 (circtndoh 1874).

Pincite

26 F. Cas. 10 (United States v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.