United States v. Grant

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Grant

37 F. App'x 625

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2002·No. 02-6505·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clifton Anthony Grant appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for review of his sentence and a subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Grant, No. CR-99-292-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2002; Mar. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Clifton Anthony Grant appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for review of his sentence and a subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Grant, No. CR-99-292-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2002; Mar. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Grant, 37 F. App'x 625 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

37 F. App'x 625 (United States v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.