United States v. Grant

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6693

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM NATHANIEL GRANT,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-6737

Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-36-C) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Nathaniel Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his

motions to reduce his sentence and for production of grand jury transcripts. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grant, No. CR-92- 36-C (W.D. Va. May 2 & 7, 1997). Appellant's motion for appointment

of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED