United States v. Grant

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Grant

667 F. App'x 762

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 25, 2016·No. No. 15-15501 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Donald Campbell Bowman, appointed counsel for Jeremy Emmanuel Grant in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to [763] Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Grant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Donald Campbell Bowman, appointed counsel for Jeremy Emmanuel Grant in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to [763] Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Grant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Grant, 667 F. App'x 762 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 762 (United States v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related