United States v. Grant
This text of 70 M.J. 264 (United States v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CCA 37631. On consideration of the motions filed by Major Phillip T. Korman, USAF, to withdraw from representation as appellate defense counsel in the above cases, it appears that the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force has assigned other counsel to represent the appellants and that new counsel have assumed representation of the appellants. Accordingly, said motions are hereby granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 M.J. 264, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-grant-armfor-2011.