United States v. Grajales

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

May 9, 1994           [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                              _________________________

          No. 93-2269

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Appellee,

                                          v.

                                  JUVENAL GRAJALES,

                                Defendant, Appellant.

                              _________________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

                 [Hon. Francis J. Boyle, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                         __________________________

                              _________________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Circuit Judge,
                                       _____________

                            Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                    ____________________

                              and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
                                          _____________

                              _________________________

               Edward  J. Romano, with whom John F. Cicilline was on brief,
               _________________            _________________
          for appellant.
               Margaret E.  Curran, Assistant United  States Attorney, with
               ___________________
          whom Edwin  J.  Gale, United  States  Attorney, and  Lawrence  D.
               _______________                                 ____________
          Gaynor,  Assistant United  States  Attorney, were  on brief,  for
          ______
          appellee.

                              _________________________

_________________________

Per Curiam.  Having  carefully reviewed the record, the
                    Per Curiam.
                    __________

          briefs, and the matters raised at oral argument, we conclude that

          no hint of error  appears.  Accordingly, we summarily  affirm the

          defendant's conviction  and the sentence imposed  by the district

          court.   See 1st Cir.  Loc. R.  27.1; see also  United States  v.
                   ___                          ___ ____  _____________

          Ruiz-Garcia, 886 F.2d 474, 477 (1st Cir. 1989).
          ___________

Affirmed.
          Affirmed.
          ________

3