United States v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District

424 F.3d 437, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20301
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 2005
Docket03-1122
StatusPublished

This text of 424 F.3d 437 (United States v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District, 424 F.3d 437, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20301 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

424 F.3d 437

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Karen T. WILSON, Plaintiff — Appellant,
v.
GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT; Cherokee County Soil & Water Conservation District; Richard Greene; William Timpson; Keith Orr; Raymond Williams; Dale Wiggins; Gerald Phillips; Allen Dehart; Lloyd Millsaps; Jerry Williams; Billy Brown; Lynn Cody; Bill Tipton; C.B. Newton; Eddie Wood; Graham County, Defendants — Appellees, and
Graham County Board of County Commissioners; Cherokee County Board of County Commissioners; Cherie Greene; Ricky Stiles; Betty Jean Orr; Joyce Lane; Jimmy Orr; Eugene Morrow; Charles Lane; Charles Laney; George Postell; Lloyd Kissleburg; Ted Orr; Bernice Orr; John Doe; John Doe Corporations, and defendant; Government Entities 1-99, Defendants.

No. 03-1122.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

September 22, 2005.

Mark Tucker Hurt, Abingdon, VA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Ben Oshel Bridgers, Haire & Bridgers, PA, Sylva, NC, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Solicitor General, Jill Beth Hickey, Assistant Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, NC, Roy H. Patton, Jr., Canton, NC, William Timpson, Marble, NC, Zeyland G. McKinney, Jr., Robbinsville, NC, Scott Douglas MacLatchie, Sean Francis Perrin, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, NC, for Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER

WILKINSON.

This case comes to us on remand from the Supreme Court. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 2444, 162 L.Ed.2d 390 (2005). In accordance with that decision, we in turn remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss it as time-barred under North Carolina's three-year statute of limitations for wrongful discharge. See N.C. Gen.Stat. § 1-52(5) (2003); Renegar v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 145 N.C.App. 78, 549 S.E.2d 227, 229 (2001).

Entered at the direction of Judge Wilkinson, with the concurrence of Judge Michael and Judge Duncan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
424 F.3d 437, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-graham-county-soil-water-conservation-district-ca4-2005.