United States v. Graham

10 C.M.A. 101, 10 USCMA 101, 27 C.M.R. 175, 1959 CMA LEXIS 382, 1959 WL 3586
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided January 2, 1959·No. No. 12,263·Published

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused were tried in a common trial for separate larcenies committed in the same places at the same time. No objection to a common trial was made at any time. At trial, defense counsel represented that “we felt that in the best interests of both accused . . . [the cases] should be tried” in common. Nothing in the record of trial indicates that either accused was prejudiced in any material respect by the trial in common. Under the circumstances, if there was impropriety in directing a common trial, it was waived by the accused. United States v Williams, 10 USCMA 33, 27 CMR 107.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Judge LATIMER concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Graham, 10 C.M.A. 101, 10 USCMA 101, 27 C.M.R. 175, 1959 CMA LEXIS 382, 1959 WL 3586 (cma 1959).

10 C.M.A. 101 (United States v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Williams
10 C.M.A. 33 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)