United States v. Graham
This text of 10 C.M.A. 101 (United States v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
The accused were tried in a common trial for separate larcenies committed in the same places at the same time. No objection to a common trial was made at any time. At trial, defense counsel represented that “we felt that in the best interests of both accused . . . [the cases] should be tried” in common. Nothing in the record of trial indicates that either accused was prejudiced in any material respect by the trial in common. Under the circumstances, if there was impropriety in directing a common trial, it was waived by the accused. United States v Williams, 10 USCMA 33, 27 CMR 107.
The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 C.M.A. 101, 10 USCMA 101, 27 C.M.R. 175, 1959 CMA LEXIS 382, 1959 WL 3586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-graham-cma-1959.