United States v. Graham

624 F. App'x 75
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 28, 2015·No. Nos. 12-4659 (L), 12-4825·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in a requested poll of the court to grant the government’s petition for rehearing en bane, the court grants the government’s petition for rehearing en banc.

No member of the court requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc filed by Appellants Graham and Jordan, and those petitions are denied. Appellant Jordan’s petition for panel rehearing is also denied.

The parties and amici curiae shall file 16 additional paper copies of their briefs and appendices previously filed in this case within 10 days. The parties may move, or the court may sua sponte order, the filing of supplemental en banc briefs pursuant to Local Rule 35(d).

This case is tentatively calendared for oral argument during the court’s March 22-25,2016, oral argument session.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Graham, 624 F. App'x 75 (4th Cir. 2015).

624 F. App'x 75 (United States v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Justin Jamal Warner
Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2022
United States v. Aaron Graham
824 F.3d 421 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Antonio Davis
648 F. App'x 295 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
State v. Andrews
134 A.3d 324 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2016)
United States v. Wayne Hill
818 F.3d 289 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Wheeler
169 F. Supp. 3d 896 (E.D. Wisconsin, 2016)
United States v. Zodhiates
166 F. Supp. 3d 328 (W.D. New York, 2016)