United States v. Graham

103 F. App'x 778
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Graham. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 F. App'x 588
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2004·No. No. 04-1049·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this forfeiture proceeding, Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order, after remand from this court, granting the Government summary judgment. We have reviewed the record [779]*779and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Graham, No. CA-99-178-7-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Graham, 103 F. App'x 778 (4th Cir. 2004).

103 F. App'x 778 (United States v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.