United States v. Graham
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7175
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
STEVEN ELLIOTT GRAHAM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-95-307, CA-97-468-3)
Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Elliott Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Steven Elliott Graham seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994
& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion adopting the report and recommendation of a mag-
istrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the district court. See United States v. Graham, Nos.
CR-95-307; CA-97-468-3 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Graham (United States v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.