United States v. Graham

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 9, 1999·No. 98-7175·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7175

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEVEN ELLIOTT GRAHAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-95-307, CA-97-468-3)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Elliott Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Steven Elliott Graham seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion adopting the report and recommendation of a mag-

istrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. See United States v. Graham, Nos.

CR-95-307; CA-97-468-3 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Graham, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Graham (United States v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related