United States v. Graham

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Graham

310 F. App'x 331

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 5, 2009·No. No. 08-14015·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Aaron Austin Graham in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and fried a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Graham’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Aaron Austin Graham in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and fried a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Graham’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Graham, 310 F. App'x 331 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

310 F. App'x 331 (United States v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related