United States v. Goycoolea
This text of 46 F. App'x 576 (United States v. Goycoolea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Germain Goycoolea appeals his conviction by guilty plea and the 24-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). Goycoolea’s contention that the indictment should be dismissed because the federal drug statutes are unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) is foreclosed by United States v. Buckland, 277 F.3d 1173, 1177 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc). His contention that the indictment should be dismissed because it [577]*577did not allege mens rea as to drug type and quantity is foreclosed by United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th Cir .2002).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 F. App'x 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-goycoolea-ca9-2002.