United States v. Gould
76 M.J. 432
This text of 76 M.J. 432 (United States v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Gould, 76 M.J. 432 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 20120727. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 on this date on the following issues:
I.WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS IMPER-MISSIBLY EXCEEDED THE LIMITATIONS OF ITS AUTHORITY ON REMAND FROM THIS COURT BY CONDUCTING A FACTUAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW.
II.WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE II FACTUALLY AND LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT.
III.WHETHER NUDITY IS A PER SE REQUIREMENT FOR AN IMAGE TO CONSTITUTE A “LASCIVIOUS EXHIBITION OF THE GENITALS OR PUBIC AREA” IN 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8)(A).
Appellant will file a brief under Rule 22(b) in support of said certificate on or before August 14, 2017.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Definitions for chapter
18 U.S.C. § 2256(8)(A)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gould-armfor-2017.