United States v. Goss

100 F. App'x 461
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Goss. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 F. App'x 365
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2004·No. No. 02-4022·Published

Opinion

In an en banc petition and a response thereto, both the defendant. Dr. Samuel R. Goss, and the government agree that the fact that Dr. Goss has now served his short sentence does not render moot the district court’s two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice and the district court’s two-level enhancement for use of a special skill. In our opinion in this case, we have expressed our serious doubts about both enhancements. See op. p. 7. For the reasons we previously stated concerning these two enhancements, we now amend our previous opinion and reverse the two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice and the two-level enhancement for use of a special skill and remand to the district court for resentencing so that the collateral consequences of the imposition of these two enhancements may be removed and Dr. Goss resentenced without these two enhancements.

Accordingly, it is so ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Goss, 100 F. App'x 461 (6th Cir. 2004).

100 F. App'x 461 (United States v. Goss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.