United States v. Gormley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8118

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES GORMLEY,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

PAINE WEBBER, INCORPORATED,

Garnishee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CR-98-152)

Submitted: July 29, 2002 Decided: September 18, 2002

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Gormley, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Assistant United States Attorney, Philip Henry Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James Gormley appeals the district court’s order of continuing

garnishment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gormley,

(S.D.W. Va. Nov. 28, 2001).* We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* On appeal, Gormley seeks to raise for the first time a claim under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). As this claim was not presented to the district court, and is not relevant to the garnishment issue, we decline to address it. Gormley may seek to raise the issue in another context before the district court.