United States v. Gordon Ronnell Hines

65 F.3d 392, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27169
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gordon Ronnell Hines. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 F.3d 74
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 22, 1995·No. 93-5935·Published

Opinion

65 F.3d 392

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gordon Ronnell HINES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-5935.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 6, 1995.
Decided Sept. 22, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh; James C. Fox, Chief District Judge (CR-93-70).

ARGUED: George Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, NC, for appellant. John Samuel Bowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee. ON BRIEF: Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, David P. Folmar, Jr., Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, WILKINS, NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge, sitting en banc.

Prior report: 39 F.3d 74.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The en banc court voted unanimously to affirm Hines' convictions on all counts except the second count of use of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense on September 19, 1992. As to that count, the court affirms the conviction by an equally divided vote.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gordon Ronnell Hines, 65 F.3d 392, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27169 (4th Cir. 1995).

65 F.3d 392 (United States v. Gordon Ronnell Hines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Gordon Ronnell Hines
39 F.3d 74 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)