United States v. Gordon Michael Duane Novel
This text of 444 F.2d 114 (United States v. Gordon Michael Duane Novel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Novel appeals from a conviction of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2512(1) (a) for willfully carrying in interstate commerce a device primarily useful for surreptitious interception of wire or oral communications. We affirm.
We have examined the record and have considered appellant’s several assignments of error. We find them without merit, concluding that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous, that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction, that the trial court properly refused appellant’s proposed jury instruction, and that appellant’s pretrial statements were properly admitted in evidence.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 F.2d 114, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gordon-michael-duane-novel-ca9-1971.