United States v. Gordon

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 17, 1996·No. 95-7329·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7329

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EVANS LEE GORDON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-75)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Evans Lee Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. John Granville Douglass, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gordon, No. CR-89-75 (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gordon, (4th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Gordon (United States v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related